By Esra Aygin
ONLY two years after the devastation and division of 1974,
when nobody could dare dream of it, the 28-year-old Mustafa Akinci imagined a
single, united Nicosia.
In the 14 years he served as the Turkish Cypriot mayor of
the divided capital from 1976 to 1990, he pioneered cooperation with his Greek
Cypriot counterpart Lellos Demetriades to develop a common Nicosia Master Plan
and common infrastructure works reuniting the city.

“He had to fight for what he did in Nicosia as a mayor,”
says Akinci’s long-time friend and confidant, journalist Hasan Kahvecioglu.
“The war had just ended and the majority was psychologically not ready for
cooperation with Greek Cypriots. Society excluded him. He was branded a
traitor. The then-Turkish Cypriot leader Denktash ostracised him and cut the
allowance to the municipality. But he faced up to all and reunited Nicosia in
terms of infrastructure and heritage.”
Akinci is stubborn and knows how it is to fight alone.
Today, Akinci, who was widely seen as the best chance for the solution of the
Cyprus problem, finds himself fighting alone once again.
During the recent visit by Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlut
Cavusoglu to the island, the longstanding disagreement between Akinci and
Ankara over the nature of a settlement could not have been made clearer.
“Some people in north Cyprus keep on saying, ‘According to
my ideology federation is the best’ and dictate what should happen,” said
Cavusoglu, referring to Akinci. “The Cyprus issue is too grand to be sacrificed
to someone’s political ideologies or political ambitions.”
“Of course nobody can single-handedly dictate the solution
model for Cyprus,” Akinci snapped back. “But this rule is valid for everyone.”
The only reason Akinci ran in the 2015 elections was to
solve the Cyprus problem through a federal solution, says Kahvecioglu.
Akinci showed Ankara he would not yield to bullying when,
only a day after he was elected, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan
attacked him for calling for “brotherly relations” with Turkey rather than one
of a “mother” and her “baby”. Erdogan warned Akinci to watch what he said and
not forget that Ankara financed the Turkish Cypriots.
“I am behind everything I have said,” responded Akinci on
live Turkish TV. “Not only I know what I say, I say it with my conscience, my
heart and my mind.”
“He is very honest and direct,” says Kahvecioglu. “And he
expects people around him to be the same.”
Throughout the negotiations, Akinci had to tread the very
thin line between being flexible, compromising and courageous to take the
necessary steps to reach an agreement with his Greek Cypriots counterpart, but
at the same time, convincing Turkey and keeping it on board. Contrary to
popular belief, the communication between Akinci and Ankara was not a one-way
channel where Ankara dictated and Akinci delivered.
“There were harsh, hours-long bargains behind closed doors
with President Erdogan especially in the territory and guarantees topics,”
explains Kahvecioglu. “He even threatened a couple of times to leave the
negotiation table if Ankara would stick to maximalist positions.”
In doing this, Akinci fully believed that Greek Cypriot
leader Nicos Anastasiades would stand by him and that they would walk together
until the end, according to Kahvecioglu. “He believed that they both knew where
they were going and wanted to go there.”
On more than one occasion during the negotiations, Akinci
took steps despite Ankara’s reservations, even objections.
“The first fight with Ankara was at Mont Pelerin [November
2016] when Akinci said he was ready to increase the percentage of area that would
be returned to the future Greek Cypriot constituent state,” said Kahvecioglu.
“Anastasiades didn’t reciprocate and asked for a recess. Then in Geneva, when
he gave a map before securing a rotating presidency, just before Greece
disrupted the conference.”
These were irreversible tactical mistakes in the
negotiations according to Ankara. When such compromises did not lead to a
successful result, Akinci was left exposed.
“Akinci is being reminded at every opportunity that he
showed his cards too soon, that Anastasiades didn’t reciprocate,” says
Kahvecioglu. “Erdogan is displeased that Akinci acted independently. And
Erdogan’s displeasure is behind today’s crises.”
Since a solution in Cyprus is not possible without Ankara’s
contribution and consent, why didn’t he manage these sensitive relations
better?
“Akinci puts a lot of faith in people he trusts,” stresses
Kahvecioglu. “He trusted Anastasiades a lot. He first and foremost saw him as a
friend, and then a political counterpart. He trusted that they could overcome
any political differences through their friendship.”
Akinci’s absolute trust in Anastasiades could even be seen
as political naivete.
“Akinci should have been conscious of the fact that there is
a politician opposite him,” says peace activist Okan Dagli. “He should have
foreseen that certain political calculations, interests, ambitions may alter
Anastasiades’ priorities. For Akinci, federal solution was the absolute
priority and he believed this was also the case for Anastasiades. His good
faith and trust got ahead of political foresight.”
Although a series of disappointments throughout the process
disheartened Akinci, he still believed that things could work out in
Crans-Montana in July 2017 when all the international actors would come
together, encourage the sides and help formulate mutually acceptable solutions
to outstanding issues.
The failure was devastating for an overemotional Akinci,
which manifested itself in his final statement at Crans-Montana: “This was the
last effort by our generation. We failed.”
“He was without hope. He could not see the way ahead,” says
Kahvecioglu to explain why Akinci made such a dramatic statement. “And later he
probably regretted having ever said that.”
Akinci retreated into silence and withdrew from everyone,
even his supporters for months after the failure in Crans-Montana.
According to Kahvecioglu, the reason for his resentment was
not just the failure to reach a solution but also the loss of a friend:
Anastasiades.
“If Mustafa Akinci is disappointed and hurt, it is because
his personal relationship has also been destroyed,” says Kahvecioglu. “He
cannot come to terms with the fact that personal friendships can be destroyed
because of political reasons.”
But the lone fighter is not willing to give up easily. “Not
because he is a romantic or a dreamer,” says Kahvecioglu. “But because he truly
believes this is the best future for both communities in Cyprus. And he will
stand up for this till the end.”
“At the moment, it is not Akinci personally, who is being
disrespected and attacked by Ankara,” explains Dagli. “It is the Turkish
Cypriot community, 60 per cent of which elected him for a five-year term for
his vision of a united, federal Cyprus.”
With an Ankara that is clearly trying to steer the process
away from a federation and an uninterested, even disruptive Greek Cypriot
leader, he has to be ever more adamant and creative if he is to succeed, Dagli
adds.
Hello to everyone out here, I am here to share the unexpected miracle that happened to me … My name is Susan Christian , I live in London, UK. we got married for more than 9 years and have gotten two kids. thing were going well with us and we are always happy. until one day my husband started to behave in a way i could not understand, i was very confused by the way he treat me and the kids. later that month he did not come home again and he called me that he want a divorce, i asked him what have i done wrong to deserve this from him, all he was saying is that he want a divorce that he hate me and do not want to see me again in his life, i was mad and also frustrated do not know what to do, i was sick for more than 2 weeks because of the divorce. i love him so much he was everything to me without him my life is incomplete. i told my sister and she told me to contact a spell caster, i never believe in all this spell casting of a thing. i just want to try if something will come out of it. i contacted Dr Emu for the return of my husband to me, they told me that my husband have been taken by another woman, that she cast a spell on him that is why he hate me and also want us to divorce. then they told me that they have to cast a spell on him that will make him return to me and the kids, they casted the spell and after 24 hours my husband called me and he told me that i should forgive him, he started to apologize on phone and said that he still love me that he did not know what happen to him that he left me. it was the spell that Dr Emu casted on him that make him come back to me today, me and my family are now happy again today. thank you Dr Emu for what you have done for me i would have been nothing today if not for your great spell. i want you my friends who are passing through all this kind of love problem of getting back their husband, wife , or ex boyfriend and girlfriend to contact Dr Emu , if you need his help you can contact him through his private mail: emutemple@gmail.com or you can contact him through his website https://emutemple.wordpress.com/ fb page Https://web.facebook.com/Emu-Temple-104891335203341 and you will see that your problem will be solved without any delay.
ReplyDelete