Esra Aygin
My intervention at a panel hosted by the French Ambassador to Nicosia Mr. Rene Troccaz on the occasion of the International Women’s Day:
My intervention at a panel hosted by the French Ambassador to Nicosia Mr. Rene Troccaz on the occasion of the International Women’s Day:
Before I start, I would like to take this opportunity to commemorate
a young woman, a mother, a victim of the shameful sex trade on this island… Volha
Viarbouskaya died 11 days ago at a nightclub in the northern part of Cyprus
under suspicious circumstances. She was only 26. She was just one of the
hundreds of women, who come to this country to earn a living and end up in the inhumane
sex industry. I believe that this woman’s day should also mark the beginning of
the much-needed acknowledgment of, and action on this common shame that we have.
***
As a journalist, I have been covering the Cyprus peace
negotiations for 18 years now. The negotiations between the Turkish Cypriot and
Greek Cypriot sides - Or rather - the negotiations between Turkish Cypriot and
Greek Cypriot men in dark suits…
I covered the Annan Plan process, I was in Burgenstock, I
followed the Annan Plan referendum, I was there when Talat and Papadopoulos, Talat
and Christofias, Eroglu and Christofias, Eroglu and Anastasiades, and
Anastasiades and Akinci negotiated peace in MY country. I was there when Turkish
Cypriot and Greek Cypriot men in dark suits - with their team of more men in
dark suits – with the facilitation of more men in dark suits - tabled,
discussed, negotiated, bargained, shattered and destroyed my future - over and
over and over again…
If you ask me today, what – in my opinion - mainly characterized
the negotiations of the past 18 years, I would tell you that it’s the men in
suits. And consequently: a burning urge
to prove a point, to be proven right, to be justified, to be vindicated -
rather than to resolve a problem.
And it’s not only these past 18 years - the Cyprus negotiations
that date back to 1968, have always been monopolized by men. Despite strong
evidence that women’s participation in peace processes increases the likelihood
of peace agreements being reached, implemented and sustained, the Cyprus peace
process has systematically excluded women. It has been carried out without the presence,
representation and input of 50% of the society … It has been carried out without
taking into consideration the concerns, fears, hopes, expectations, needs and
priorities of 50 % of the society. We are talking about a Cyprus peace process
that excludes 50% of the society in Cyprus…
While doing some reading for this evening, I came across some
very interesting information:
Research has found there is a marked difference in how men
and women define peace. Men prioritise negative peace, focusing on the absence
of formal conflict and insecurity, and on the stability of formal structures. A
peace process of men in dark suits would naturally be focused on troop numbers,
timelines, composition of the governance structure, and which ethnic community
will constitute what percentage of police.
Women on the other hand, value positive peace. They are more
interested in peace on a local level, with emphasis on family and community
needs. Evidence indicates that women participants in peace processes are
usually focused less on the spoils of war and more on reconciliation,
economic development, education and transitional justice – which are all
critical for sustainable peace.
And by women’s participation, I don’t mean involving a
couple of women in the negotiation teams as ‘token women.’ I mean presence of
empowered women with decision-making powers, who can make a real influence in
the negotiations.
When I question why - despite all the evidence - women are
systematically left out of the negotiations process, I am told “women are not strong
enough” “not resilient enough” “could break under criticism and pressure”, that
“women can’t understand war and conflict” that “women don’t know diplomacy” or “god
forbid they would make too many compromises” …
Let me tell you something:
Women are strong. No matter what the background, they
probably have had to fight hundreds of wars every single day of their lives to
get to where they are. Look at the woman sitting in front of you, next to you,
behind you – she most probably has had to work at least twice as hard as you,
to achieve the same recognition and be here.
Women don’t break under criticism. They’ve been criticized
all their lives for being successful, for not being successful - being pretty,
not pretty enough - being ambitious, being carefree – having a career, not having
a career – for trying too hard, for not trying hard enough…
Because winning by a physical fight is usually not an
option, women are experts in diplomacy from a very young age. They know
compromise is part of life and they constantly meet their husbands, parents,
children, colleagues, friends halfway.
Women find a way – they’ve done so, most of their lives on a
daily basis to survive.
Women know violence – more women die from violence against
women than all wars combined.
Women know war – they are the main victims of war along with
children. And despite this, they are the ones keeping life going during wars. They
know that no peace can be worse than war.
Before I end my words I would like to give you an update of
the Cyprus peace process. I am hearing that the main obstacle in front of a
meeting between Mr. Anastasiades and Mr. Akinci is the disagreement over who
will pick up the phone first.
Men have failed us. Let women take it from here…
Men peh
ReplyDelete