Showing posts with label UN. Show all posts
Showing posts with label UN. Show all posts

Sunday, 19 May 2019

Clues for solution: UN takes pulse of communities


Research findings were reflected in UNSG reports and UN Security Council resolutions

There is desire but no belief

For Turkish Cypriots the biggest benefit from solution is economic growth, for Greek Cypriots it’s the properties and territory

Turkish Cypriots want information on effective participation, Greek Cypriots want information on troops

Communities want to live under the administration of their own community

Both communities fear a possible conflict in the event of solution

In non-solution, Turkish Cypriots fear deterioration of economic conditions, Greek Cypriots fear de-facto recognition of the Turkish Cypriot community


ESRA AYGIN 


According to the research commissioned by the United Nations on both sides of the island, the majority of Greek Cypriots want the settlement negotiations to resume and believe in the urgency of a solution.


Negotiations should resume

The research on the attitudes, levels of trust, fears and concerns of the Turkish Cypriot and Greek Cypriot community, 70% of the Greek Cypriots wish that the negotiations resume and 62% feels that a solution is urgently needed. The percentage of Turkish Cypriots, who wish that negotiations resume, is 51%. Among the Turkish Cypriot respondents, 46% feel that a solution is urgently needed, while 43% feel that there is no urgency.


There is desire but no belief

According to the research conducted among 500 Turkish Cypriots and 500 Greek Cypriots at the end of 2018, although the majority of Greek Cypriots desire the resumption of negotiations and believe in the urgency of a solution, only 21% believe that there will be a solution to the Cyprus problem. Forty-four per cent of Turkish Cypriot respondents believe that there will be a solution.



The respondents in both communities with inter-communal contacts have much higher belief that there will be a solution. While only 14% of Greek Cypriots with no contact with the other community believe that there will be a solution, this percentage goes up to %29 among those, who do have contact with the other community.

Only 16% of Turkish Cypriot with no contact with the other community believes that there will be a solution, while among those, who do have contact with the other community, the percentage goes up to 58%.


For Turkish Cypriots the biggest benefit from solution is economic growth

In the research by the Office of the Special Adviser to the Secretary-General on Cyprus, respondents were also asked about the potential benefits from a solution. For Turkish Cypriots, the biggest possible benefit from a solution is ‘economic growth.’ This is followed by ‘an end to uncertainty,’ ‘exploitation of hydrocarbons,’ ‘territorial adjustments,’ ‘preservation of our culture,’ and ‘return of properties to refugees.’



For Greek Cypriots the biggest potential benefits from solution are properties and territory

According to the research, for Greek Cypriots, the biggest potential benefits from a solution are ‘return of properties to refugees’ and ‘territorial adjustments.’ These are followed by ‘exploitation of hydrocarbons,’ ‘withdrawal of foreign troops,’ ‘economic growth,’ and ‘safety/security.’

There is lack of information

The research, which included face-to-face interviews and focus groups and was conducted by Prologue in the northern part of Cyprus and CyMar in the southern part of the island, revealed that the majority from both communities do not feel adequately informed about the process. In response to how informed they feel about the process, %79 of Turkish Cypriots and 77% of Greek Cypriots said  ‘only a little,’ and ‘not at all.’

Turkish Cypriots want information on effective participation
Greek Cypriots want information on troops

In the research that was also reflected in the reports of UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres and UN Security Council resolutions, respondents were also asked on which aspects of the solution they would desire information. Turkish Cypriots expressed desire for more information on ‘how power will be shared to ensure effective participation of both communities in the central government,’ and ‘how the equivalent treatment of all Greek and Turkish nationals in Cyprus will be achieved.’ These were followed by ‘what will be decided on the issue of Greek and Turkish troops on the island,’ ‘what will be decided on the issue of the Treaty of Guarantees,’ and how the property and territory issues will be solved.

Greek Cypriots, who participated in the research, expressed desire for information on ‘what will be decided on the issue of Greek and Turkish troops on the island.’ This was followed by ‘what will be decided on the issue of the Treaty of Guarantees,’ ‘how power will be shared to ensure effective participation of both communities in the central government,’ ‘how the equivalent treatment of all Greek and Turkish nationals in Cyprus will be achieved’ and how the property and territory issues will be solved.


Communities want to live under the administration of their own community

As part of the research, which contains important information about the communities’ approach to the Cyprus problem, solution and inter-communal relations, the respondents were asked under which administration/constituent state they would prefer to live in the event of a solution. Seventy five per cent of the Turkish Cypriot respondents and 82% of the Greek Cypriot respondents said
They will prefer to live under the administration of their own community.

Seventy-seven per cent of Greek Cypriots did not believe that the members of their own community would move to the other side and live under the administration of the other community. Sixty-eight per cent of Turkish Cypriots did not believe that the members of their own community would move to the other side and live under the administration of the other community. However, 65% of Greek Cypriots said they believed that Turkish Cypriots would move to the Greek Cypriot administration.


Both communities fear a possible conflict in the event of solution

The research also revealed the fears of Turkish Cypriots and Greek Cypriots in the case of a solution.

In the case of a solution, both Turkish Cypriots and Greek Cypriots fear ‘conflict/fighting between members of the two communities.’ For Turkish Cypriots, this fear is followed by ‘becoming a minority, ‘lack of autonomy in decision making’ and ‘political and social instability.’

For Greek Cypriots, the fear of a ‘conflict/fighting between members of the two communities’ is followed by ‘increasing influence of Turkey in Cyprus,’ ‘becoming a minority,’ and ‘political and social instability.’








In non-solution, Turkish Cypriots fear deterioration of economic conditions
Greek Cypriots fear de-facto recognition of the Turkish Cypriot community

According to the research, which also demonstrated the fears of the communities in the case of non-solution, Turkish Cypriots are most fearful of the ‘deterioration of economic conditions.’ This is followed by ‘the Turkish Cypriot community being absorbed by Turkey,’ ‘loss of employment,’ and ‘political isolation.’ Greek Cypriots are most fearful of ‘de facto recognition of the Turkish Cypriot community,’ followed by ‘the Turkish Cypriot community being absorbed by Turkey,’ ‘status quo remaining,’ and ‘war/armed conflict’ in the case of non-solution.

 






The public needs to be informed and included in the process

Ninety-three per cent of Turkish Cypriot and 87% of Greek Cypriot respondents believe that the public should be consulted on major policy decision and on the peace process. Fifty-eight per cent of Turkish Cypriots believe that the leadership should inform the public and also receive feedback from the public. Sixty-four per cent say the Civil Society should become more representative with a meaningful role in the peace process. Seventy-nine per cent of Greek Cypriots believe that the leadership should inform the public and also receive feedback from the public. Seventy-eight per cent say the Civil Society should become more representative with a meaningful role in the peace process.



RELATIONS BETWEEN COMMUNITIES

‘Peacefully living together is possible’

According to the research, which also looks at the relations between communities and compares data from the last ten years, for the first time since 2009, the majority in both communities believe that the Greek Cypriots and Turkish Cypriots can peacefully live together. Fifty-one per cent of Turkish Cypriots and 61% of Greek Cypriots believe that the two communities can peacefully live together.




 
Again, compared with data from the previous years, the research revealed that acceptability of having neighbours and friends from the other community among Turkish Cypriots and Greek Cypriots is increasing.

For 65% the respondents from the Turkish Cypriot community and 70% of the respondents from the Greek Cypriot community, it is acceptable that their children or siblings are going to mixed schools. Acceptability of having a common university is 75% for the Turkish Cypriot community and 77% of the Greek Cypriot community.

Sixty-one per cent of the Turkish Cypriots and 57% of the Greek Cypriots are open to mandatory teaching of the other language.


Despite increased crossings, contact is not enough

According to the research, although the number of people, who have crossed to the other side, increased consistently over the last years, personal contacts between the members of the two communities remains limited. During the last year 56% of Greek Cypriots, who crossed to the northern part of the island, and 35% of Turkish Cypriots, who crossed to the southern part of the island, did not have any contacts with a member of the other community.

Communities don’t know each other, there are prejudices

During the research, Turkish Cypriots and Greek Cypriots were also asked what they think is the biggest barrier to closer contact and communication between the two communities. According to the findings that revealed how little the communities know each other, Turkish Cypriots said they see ‘distrust of the other community,’ ‘legal barriers,’ and ‘desire to live apart’ by the Greek Cypriot community as barriers to closer contact and cooperation. Greek Cypriots saw ‘distrust of the other community,’ ‘fear of the other community,’ and ‘desire to  live apart’ by the Turkish Cypriots as barriers to closer contact and cooperation.



To analyse the perception of fear in detail, the respondents were asked if they agree with the statements: ‘The other community has nothing to fear from us,’ ‘we have nothing to fear of the other community,’ and ‘I understand why the other community might fear us.’

Sixty-two per cent of Turkish Cypriot respondents agreed that ‘the other community has nothing to fear from us.’ Those who agreed with ‘we have nothing to fear of the other community,’ was 69%, and those who agreed with ‘I understand why the other community might fear us’ was 56%.

When Greek Cypriot respondents were asked to do the same, 73% of them agreed that ‘the other community has nothing to fear from us.’ Those, who agreed with ‘we have nothing to fear of the other community,’ was 38%, and those, who agreed with ‘I understand why the other community might fear us’ was 49%.


Trust is increasing

According to the research, there is a positive trend over the last 12 years of increased trust in both communities. However, more than half of both communities do not trust the other community. Forty-six per cent of the Turkish
Cypriot respondents said they trust the member of the other community, while 49% of the Greek Cypriot respondents said they trust the member of the other community.


Turkish Cypriots want the mobile phones to work
Greek Cypriots want joint excursions

The research also revealed the Turkish Cypriots’ and Greek Cypriots’ approach to confidence building measures. Turkish Cypriots supported respectively ‘lifting of the roaming restrictions,’ ‘island-wide excursions for Turkish Cypriots and Greek Cypriots to visit places of interest,’ ‘cooperation between businesses in the two communities,’ ‘jointly produced education material by Turkish Cypriots and Greek Cypriots to all schools,’ ‘opening of more crossing points,’ and ‘student exchange programs.’ Greek Cypriots supported respectively ‘island-wide excursions for Turkish Cypriots and Greek Cypriots to visit places of interest,’ ‘cooperation between businesses in the two communities,’ ‘lifting of the roaming restrictions,’ jointly produced education material by Turkish Cypriots and Greek Cypriots to all schools,’ and ‘student exchange programs.’ Only 37% of Greek Cypriot respondents however, said they support ‘opening of more crossing points.’


Support for cooperation with the exception of natural resources

Respondents of both communities said they would like to see closer cooperation in areas of ecologic and environmental issues, economic cooperation, cultural and sport events, addressing natural disasters, water management, electricity management and education. However, the majority of Greek Cypriots did not approve closer cooperation in the management of natural resources. Sixty-nine per cent of Turkish Cypriots supported closer cooperation in ‘managing natural resources, including gas and oil reserves,’ while only 36% of Greek Cypriot supported it.




Research findings were reflected in UNSG reports and UN Security Council resolutions

The research findings have been reflected in the UN Security Council resolutions and the reports of UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres.

The UN Security Council, in its resolution 2453 on 30 January 2019 called on the sides to promote peace education across the island, prepare the communities for a settlement through public messages on convergences, increase and strengthen the participation of civil society in the process, and encourage inter-communal cooperation, contact and dialogue.

UN Secretary General Guterres, in his latest report published on 14 April 2019, called on the leaders to prepare the communities for a solution and stated that research shows that a large majority in both communities felt little or not at all informed about what a settlement plan would look like. Guterres also underlined the communities’ desire to be included in the process. Based on the research findings that reveal that both communities are open to cooperating in many fields, the Secretary General called on the leaders for increasing opportunities for bi-communal cooperation and underlined the importance of the interoperability of mobile phones.

The Secretary General also stated that the research revealed the fears of the majority in both communities regarding the implications of a continued failure to reach a settlement including fears about the political, economic and social costs.



Saturday, 12 August 2017

Anastasiades commitment to peace comes under scrutiny

June 3, 2016

By Esra Aygin
President Anastasiades’ decision to cancel Friday’s leaders’ meeting is viewed as an “overreaction” by politicians and analysts in the north.
It was a response to Turkish Cypriot leader Mustafa Akinci’s presence at a dinner hosted by the Turkish President at the UN Humanitarian Summit in Istanbul and his meeting with UN boss Ban Ki-moon.
While some suspected Akinci was trapped by Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, who wanted to sabotage the negotiations, Anastasiades’ commitment to a solution in 2016 was questioned.
Akinci, on his return to Cyprus, said he had not attended the summit, but only the dinner hosted by Erdogan and met Ban about the peace process.
“I don’t understand this reaction,” said Akinci.
“Not being able to tolerate our presence there is meaningless. We were not invited and I did not go to an event of the UN…We accepted the invitation to an event organised by the Turkish President and nobody has the right to say anything about this. The Greek Cypriot side’s reaction is a disproportionate reaction.”
Akinci said the Turkish Cypriot side was doing its utmost for a solution in Cyprus.
“We will be doing our utmost for a solution defending our rights and looking out for the equality, freedom and security of the Turkish Cypriot people, and of course also looking out for the reasonable sensitivities of the other community.
“But this does not mean that the Turkish Cypriot people will stay constrained to the buffer zone… This does not mean that the Turkish Cypriot people will not be able to attend a dinner hosted by the President of the only country that recognises them and that they will not be able to have a fruitful meeting with the UN Secretary General. This intolerance is unacceptable.”
The day and the time of the meeting with the Secretary General had not been fixed until the last moment and this is why his trip to Istanbul had not been announced, said Akinci.
Sources close to him say that he would not have gone just for the dinner had the UNSG meeting not been organised. Critics queried if Greek Cypriots cannot tolerate the Turkish Cypriot leader’s presence at a dinner, how will they be able to accept Turkish Cypriots as equal partners in a federation.

Saturday, 1 April 2017

A new model for Cyprus talks

By Esra Aygin
Aware that the window of opportunity for a solution is closing rapidly, Turkish Cypriot leader Mustafa Akinci wishes to discuss on Sunday how the negotiations process can be redesigned.
The two leaders will have a social meeting over dinner this Sunday after a recess of six weeks. “There are about 10 make-or-break issues that remain to be agreed on,” said a Turkish Cypriot source close to negotiations.
“During the dinner, the leaders should define the way forward and how to achieve progress. Convergence on most of these issues would clear the way for a second meeting in Geneva.”
The Turkish Cypriot side feels that a different methodology should be followed once the negotiations resume, allowing the sides to focus on outstanding issues in a results-oriented manner.
The UN should also have an enhanced facilitation role with the aim of bringing the sides closer, the source said.
Negotiations stalled in February when the Greek Cypriot parliament voted for annual commemorations at state schools for a 1950 Enosis plebiscite in support of union with Greece.
The vote led to collective backlash among the vast majority of Turkish Cypriots, who consider the Enosis aim as the reason behind inter-communal clashes.
A new proposal that is expected to render the Enosis decision void will be taken up by the parliament next week.
The priority for the Turkish Cypriot side once the negotiations begin will be to reach an understanding over political equality-related issues, according to the source.
Akinci has been under immense pressure, both from circles in Cyprus and Turkey, for making too many concessions, especially by presenting a map with proposed territorial adjustments without having secured the political equality of Turkish Cypriots in a future federal Cyprus.
“The months of April and May will be decisive,” Akinci said earlier this week.
“It will be clear whether Greek Cypriots are willing to share governance between two equal constituent states.”
There is a broad understanding that a number of internal and external factors such as hydrocarbon exploration activities off the coasts of Cyprus and commencement of the campaign period of presidential elections in the south will complicate negotiations beyond May.
Concerned that the Enosis vote and the ensuing controversy led to a massive loss of confidence between the two communities, Akinci also wishes to discuss with President Nicos Anastasiades a number of confidence-building measures.
This includes the interoperability of mobile phones, interconnectivity of the electricity system and the work of the bi-communal education committee.
“The leaders should now, more than ever, focus on confidence-building measures,” the source said.
“It would be only natural for the leaders to discuss how to build or restore confidence between the two communities now. Not doing so would be reproachable.”

Saturday, 20 February 2016

Move towards end game (The Cyprus Weekly, 14 February 2016)

By Esra Aygin
Seen from the public angle it has not been the best of weeks for the Cyprus settlement talks. Leaders President Nicos Anastasiades and Turkish Cypriot Mustafa Akinci have publicly differed over interpretations of what has been agreed and Turkey’s president, Recep Tayyip Erdogan has been cited as saying that the return of Morphou is not on the table.
But behind the scenes a lot has already been achieved and those involved in the negotiations are already thinking ahead to planning and implementation.
“We are done with the bulk of the work in four chapters – governance and power sharing, EU, economy, property, although a couple of important outstanding issues remain,” said UN Special Advisor Espen Barth Eide.
He said it had been agreed that territorial adjustment and guarantees would be tackled at the end “but that does not mean that they have not been touched upon. What it means is that the maps and figures part of territory will be at the end”.
Quiet work has already started on security and guarantees.
“The final conclusions of this will be in that last phase … I have been quite frequently in touch with Athens and Ankara and London and the Security Council and all the interested players, and obviously with the sides, to try to see how we can prepare that phase.”
Eide is upbeat on the initial outcome.
“When I started I thought it would be the most important and the most difficult. But now I still think it’s important but not necessarily the most difficult,” Eide said.
“Traditionally security has been sought to the detriment of the other side … So you have to find a new model of security, where I am secure and you are secure, and I don’t mind that you are secure because your security is not to my detriment, that we are secure together.”
Practical implementation
While the political deals are being sorted out, the focus is already shifting to the implementation stage.
“We are in the early stages of that now,” said Eide, when asked if they were already in discussions on how the solution will be implemented.
“We are now into the technical phase where we are working on a number of very important issues, but issues that are not really politically divisive … It’s funding, it’s the euro implementation in the north, it’s the acquis, it’s preparing for constitutional work, its thinking about implementation.
“All these issues must be done.And they will take months.”
The main idea is to ensure that everything is ready for the moment the political deal is sealed.
“We want to make sure that when we get to the phase where the final, truly political, difficult issues are settled, we have the framework for the rest already down and prepared and planned,” said the UN envoy.
“This is the phasing …what will happen immediately, what will happen in two months.”
A package solution for finance
One key aspect of preparation relates to the economics of a solution.
“The IMF, the World Bank and the EU Commission are here constantly now. There is a big delegation almost every week looking at different economic aspects.
“They are working on issues like introduction of the euro to the north, banking sector, viability, debt pension obligations, all practical issues of an economy and all this work will be factored into a solution.”
As regards financing, Eide indicated that they were looking at a combination of options from the public and private sector.
“We are looking into a package solution that would involve two forms of international public support, plus international investment. And the two forms are a combination of grants or donations and guarantees that can help the foreign private investment.”
Guarantees on government bonds from highly-rated countries or institutions can help countries borrow at lower rates. The US, for example, has frequently guaranteed Israel’s bonds.
“The private investor would say I can take this risk because it’s not so high,” Eide explains.

Tuesday, 26 May 2015

Getting down to business (The Cyprus Weekly, 16 May 2015)


Esra Aygin

In a new opportunity seen widely as the best in a decade and probably the last, Turkish Cypriot Leader Mustafa Akıncı and Greek Cypriot Leader Nicos Anastasiades are scheduled to meet today to resume negotiations for the comprehensive solution of the Cyprus 
problem.

The new pro-solution Turkish Cypriot leader Akıncı, together with his team headed by the experienced and knowledgeable negotiator Özdil Nami, is planning a very well-structured and intense process. According to sources, The Turkish Cypriot side aims to achieve substantial results by the third week of September, when the UN General Assembly will be held. The rationale behind this is to create the opportunity for the thorniest or most difficult issues to be taken up during the UN General Assembly in New York. To this end, Akıncı, who has stated that he prefers to deal with issues personally in direct, face-to-face meetings with Anastasiades, is expected propose that the leaders meet at least once every two weeks, while the leaders’ negotiators engage in a more frequent meeting schedule.

It is widely acknowledged that a failure in this round of negotiations between Akıncı – who won the Turkish Cypriot community’s overwhelming support for his vision for a federal solution on the island, and Anastasiades – who, taking a big political risk against all odds advocated a ‘yes’ vote for the Annan Plan in 2004 - would spell an end for hopes of any kind of federal solution. And there are clear indications that the international community, including the United Nations, would not be as willing to - let alone investing so much energy, time and money – get involved in any kind of dialogue between the sides beyond that point. Therefore, Akıncı and Anastasiades have on their shoulders a historic responsibility, which will determine the future of the island.

The sides - in an effort to create a common ground and vision for negotiations - are expected to spend the first couple of weeks into the process to review the progress made so far in negotiations carried out under the auspices of the UN Good Offices Mission. The guiding document will be 11 February 2014 Joint Communiqué, which sets out the framework for a federal solution on the island. Considering the fact that both the Turkish Cypriot and the Greek Cypriot side have submitted proposals that were not in line with the 11 February document over the last year, this exercise would help the sides to adopt positions compatible with the spirit of the Joint Communiqué.

Efforts on confidence building measures (CBMs) – especially ones that would contribute to and improve the daily lives of Cypriots on both sides of the island – are also expected to start immediately. The Turkish Cypriot side wants to first take up and solve, in a matter of a couple of weeks, the problem of interconnectivity, therefore enabling mobile phones to be used throughout the island through a roaming agreement. Other CBMs to be agreed upon by the Turkish Cypriot and Greek Cypriot leader – such as introducing new crossing points or starting preparatory work for the opening of closed-off Varosha under UN supervision and the use of Famagusta Port and Ercan Airport for direct trade and flights - will most probably be taken up by technical teams in a parallel process to negotiations.

Nevertheless, Akıncı has been very specific in underlining in a couple of occasions that he will be careful not to focus on CBMs at the expense of comprehensive solution negotiations saying “All confidence building measures should be viewed as a catalyzing factor for the comprehensive solution.”